From the author: I am writing an article on order. I am writing an article on order. More precisely, at the request, which is in the commentary of the respected Mira to the note. Here to THIS one. And why are we still inclined to do part of our affairs (or even all) “to hell with”? Here, I think, is the question of the Slave and the Sovereign according to J. Bataille. Giving will and responsibility to someone who is higher and stronger. More authoritative. More authoritarian. The result is a voluntary surrender by the Slave of his will and responsibility to the Sovereign. In archaic times, the Leader was responsible for the entire tribe. Or Shaman. He had undivided power, and... it was He who should have once been executed (made a scapegoat) for all tribal sins. Well, or his daughter. Are there not enough fairy tales about brides promised to Death? I talk to myself, if I am in the position of a Slave, about giving up responsibility to the One who can evaluate and make a judgment about what I am worth and what I have achieved. He will be able to give me an assessment and resolve the issue of my qualifications. In general, make a judgment about me. Here is an example: I have a “certificate” that I am not a fool, which means that it is so. I have a certificate in the form of a piece of cardboard with a stamp - I am a specialist, and it doesn’t matter what I think or know about myself. I don’t “should” know anything, the “competent authorities” know for me. Let them decide whether I'm special or not. There is a “piece of paper”, which means there is also knowledge, skills and abilities. Automatically. How can you get this piece of paper? Some people resist getting knowledge, others understand that a piece of paper (and in their understanding, knowledge automatically) can be obtained much easier. “Thank you, Lord, for taking it with money.” Jewish wisdom. Anyone who understands that a piece of paper and someone else’s opinion does not help solve questions in life, seeks answers to these questions himself, becoming a Sovereign. He himself decides how professional he is, based on the results of his activities and people’s feedback, adjusting and improving his skills, in addition to “papers”. The sovereign is PERSONALLY responsible for his actions. For his knowledge, because he needs it not for reporting, but for use in life. We are taught to receive not knowledge, but grades at school. This is true. At the same time, we are not taught to love... more precisely, like that. We are taught NOT to love learning. Why? Well,.....how....What is the highest reward for successful studies? Grade? Figurines! Exemption from lessons, a test, taking an exam “on the machine” or...vacation! Bamboleilo!))) For good studies they are rewarded with privileged NOT teaching. How to “take a break” from studying? Get an excellent grade. Knowledge? Well, no... knowledge for “unscheduled vacations” is not enough. Need an assessment. Well, here we go. We do lessons on “leave me alone, let me go for a walk.” And we enjoy life. For those who study “for themselves,” give textbooks according to an extended program or additional reading. Grades are not important for such students. They will write a test with a C, but in the field they will independently solve a question that “excellent students on paper” know how to solve, but theoretically, and have forgotten even that. True, they are rarely in the field, and they don’t know that they “don’t know” " There is an expert opinion about their professional suitability, why resist and do it conscientiously, and not just leave me alone and fuck off. Conscience comes into play here, gentlemen... Your Irina Panina. Together we will find the path to your hidden capabilities. My Website.